Version 3 more bugs

Has anyone else found that the Undo command in version 3 seems to be less reliable than the previous release? What is going on with this release, it seems worse than the previous version, the hatch patterns have gone and Mtext is useless again. Back to Version 2.20027 for now.

Comments

  • Here is a list of bugs I have been complaining about since v2.2.0010. That¿s four releases. None have been properly addressed. Am I the only one who wants these fixed?UNDO command still not right. Undo will some times undo things out of the sequence they were created often things done hours earlier. Redo does not restore these things and is of no help.STRETCH still doesn¿t handle broken lines (HIDDEN, DASHED, PHANTOM, etc.) right (moves instead of stretching when the pick box crosses the line through a broken section.ENDPOINT snap is still always on (even when it¿s off) so far as multi segment poly lines are concerned when ever any other Osnap is on.The undo controls the (DRAWINGS SETTINGS, DISPLAY, PROGRAM INTERFACE, UNDO CONTROLS) still don¿t save and must be set for every drawing every time you bring it up.I Still get ¿ghost¿ crosshairs, pick boxes, and the like. REGEN gets rid of them but it is annoying.When you edit several lines of DTEXT at the same time (the text: is usually different) and change the text justification, instead of repositioning the newly justified text in the same position of the old (same origin of insert point) it changes all the origins to 0,0,0. If I edit the justification one text line at a time it works fine.Unwanted change to MTEXT height after using text editor.J Templeton

  • The UNDO command was working for us in ICAD 98, since then we have not been able to use any other versions of IntelliCAD. I have contacted different ICAD vendors but no one seems to want to fix it.

  • I'm evalaluating software and must say this attitude makes me rethink purchaseing ICAD! Why pay for an unsupported product?" I have contacted different ICAD vendors but no one seems to want to fix it."

This discussion has been closed.